Basketball Player Development Systems

Last week, I wrote about the weekly training schedule for the Unicaja Malaga junior teams. The only comment concerned education.

On another site, I saw AAU basketball criticized for its negative impact on education, following upon the ESPN OTL discussion on AAU vs. high school basketball.

While my main point for this piece is player development, I wanted to address education first. Unicaja plays its games on weekends leaving weekdays free of travel to games. Likewise, AAU tournaments are almost all on weekends. During this past high school season, tournaments that attracted out of town teams started on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. One team which played in several out of town, national-caliber tournaments missed at least 11 days of school in December. Also, I know when I played, a road game typically meant 30 minutes travel to and from the game, plus arriving an hour early, plus one-and-a-half hours for the game, plus 20 minutes post-game. Rather than a two-hour practice, a weekday road game is a three-and-a-half hour time expenditure. So, how is club basketball or the European schedule any more of a threat to education than the high school season?

As for player development, let’s examine the basic schedules:

High School

During the season, teams play, on average, two games per week. A typical  game schedule is Wednesday-Friday. Therefore, teams have three practices per week (Monday, Tuesday and Thursday) and sometimes four (Saturday). The average practice is two to two-and-a-half hours. If the teams plays, on average, one home game and one away game per week, and practices three times per week, the average amount of time spent on basketball is about 13-14 hours per week split between three team practices and two games. Some teams may add weight lifting – though many do not lift during the season – which could add 2-3 hours of weight lifting to each player’s commitment.

Club Basketball

During the spring, most club teams practice 1 – 2 times per week and play a tournament with 3 – 5 games per tournament on the weekend. Some teams do not practice at all during the week because they attract players from a wide geographical area (out of state), so they run mini-camps on weekends where they do not play in a tournament. On average, let’s say that teams practice once per week and play four games in a weekend tournament. Therefore, the average expenditure of time is 10.5 hours plus travel time and dead time at the tournament. Most clubs do not lift weights together.

Due to the lack of practice, many players seek individual training during the week to work on their individual skills. Also, many high schools (at least in California) play year-round, so players have team practices with their high school teams plus spring leagues and/or tournaments.

Unicaja Schedule

Each Unicaja player has two days of individual or position-specific workouts for a total of two hours per week.

They have four team practices that last two hours or less for another eight hours.

They work with a strength coach on speed, quickness, agility and strength for now more than an hour on four days per week for, at most, four hours per week.

They play one game on the weekend. Their total time investment is about 18 hours per week plus travel time to the away games.

Analysis

Unicaja’s schedule involves slightly more time than the average high school program that lifts weights and considerably more time than the average club team or high school team that does not lift weights.

However, the biggest advantage of Unicaja’s system is that one person – the Head Coach – organizes the entire schedule. Therefore, the assistant coaches, head coach, strength coach and others involved in the development process work together and organize the schedule. If the strength coach thinks the players look fatigued, the coaches can communicate and adjust the schedule or the training.

The problem with the club/high school schedule, especially since many players play for both during the spring, fall and summer, is the lack of communication and coordination. A club coach may give his players a weekend off because he feels they are fatigued, but rather than rest, the players play in a high school tournament or work with a personal trainer.

I spoke to a mother a couple years ago when I invited her daughter to a free workout. Her mother was interested, but said she did not have time. She explained that her daughter had two high school team practices per week, two AAU team practices per week, three sessions per week with a “plyo coach,” two workouts per week with a personal trainer in group workouts and a tournament every weekend with her high school team and AAU team. She invested 15 hours per week plus the weekend tournaments. The irony, however, was that when I watched her play during the season with a college recruiting coordinator, the college coach said that she looked like she could be pretty good if she worked with a good coach!

The problem with her training schedule was that none of the coaches communicated. Her “plyo coach” worked separately from her workout coach and her AAU coach did not communicate with her high school coach. No coach overworked the player by him or herself, but the accumulation of training over time was probably too much (close to 25 hours if you count the weekend tournaments, without a single day to rest).

If looking strictly at the high school schedule versus the Unicaja schedule, Unicaja’s schedule provides several advantages.

  1. Assuming that most coaches do not like to lift weights the day before the game, when can a team lift weights? Monday and Saturday. How productive are workouts the day after a game on the weekend?
  2. The Unicaja schedule incorporates two individual position-specific skill workouts, while the high school schedule is all team practices.
  3. The Unicaja schedule provides a day of rest two times a week (Wednesday and Sunday), while the high school schedule combines the two 0ff-days (Saturday and Sunday).
  4. With a game only on Saturdays, Unicaja can practice hard Monday, Tuesday and Thursday and have a day for a lighter practice before game day. The high school schedule affords a hard practice on Monday.
  5. With two games per week, coaches spend much of their time preparing for their next opponent on their Tuesday and Thursday practices. With one game per week, Unicaja can use Monday, Tuesday and Thursday for more general practices and Friday to prepare for their next opponent.

The Unicaja training schedule favors player development simply because of its structure. Meanwhile, the typical high school schedule is geared toward competition and game preparation.

When I argue about various systems, this is my argument. Unicaja’s system favors development through its schedule. It’s not about coaching styles or ability. The schedule provides the time to emphasize player development, while the high school schedule is more rushed and focused on games.

Secondly, the Unicaja system keeps all parts – players, coaches, strength coaches, trainers – on the same page where they can work together for each athlete, while the current high school/club schedule lacks continuity as each segment works as its own entity.

The high school/club schedule puts a heavy emphasis on the player and parents to understand his body, understanding his training and create an individual program within these different entities to meet the individual’s needs within his various team’s goals and schedules.

I know players who skip club practice to work with trainers because they feel the club practice is useless. I know players who skip high school tournaments for club tournaments because of the better competition. I know players who skip club practices for a high school league game because they feel that games are more important than practices.

Because of all their commitments, they are stretched and have to make choices which often pits one coach against another in a battle for a player’s loyalties.

The Unicaja system eliminates these choices and battles and organizes all the training activities in one location with one goal and one commitment for the players. The benefits of the Unicaja system are those that I envision for the Elite Development League and see as an improvement over the current system where players go back and forth between high school and club ball and trainers and strength coaches. My goal with the EDL is to present an alternative that negates the pressure that players feel to transfer schools to a better basketball program and creates a more unified development system rather than the current hodge-podge of programs to encourage a more balanced, periodized schedule which emphasizes player development with competition, not just game preparation and competition.

~ by Brian McCormick on June 2, 2009.

5 Responses to “Basketball Player Development Systems”

  1. If the Spain system is in any way similar to the French one, the team also cooperates rather closely with the high school, which adds another coordination – between the education side and the sports side.

  2. IMO,

    What you’ve termed here as the “Unicaja System” vs the “High School System” are not, in fact, named correctly.

    Substitute the terms:

    * “Single Team Experience” for “Unicaja”;

    and,

    * “Mulitple Team Experience” for “High School”;

    and it removes the bias from the language you are using and more accurately depicts the situation which you’re attempting to dissect.

    When the choice is phrased in this way, however … it becomes clear to see the benefits of playing and training with a single, highly competent head coach, who co-ordinates the development of his/her players over an extended period of time with the best interests of the players and The Team at-heart without the DISTRACTIONS involved with having/trying [in vain?] to serve multiple masters at the same time.

    Find yourself a good teacher, for a specific endeavour which you wish to pursue in your Life. Then, stick with that person through thick & thin, trusting their expertise and the different aspects of that field this specific teacher will expose you to, in your best interests. Working with this teacher will, inevitably, lead you to other like-minded individuals who will then carry you forward to a different level of experience.

    It’s the way the world works.

    One good teacher who happens to be a good fit for you, individually, is fundamentally better for you than a host of less-than good teachers, each trying to serve your many different needs in an uncoordinated way.

    It promotes healthy, well-balanced personal development and gives you a lifestyle which you will be SATISFIED with at the end of the day because you’ve become the best you were capable of becoming in each facet of Your Life.

  3. I used “Unicaja” because it is the specific Unicaja schedule that I blogged about earlier which was described by one of Unicaja’s coaches in another magazine. My experience with European clubs was much different and more in line with the typical AAU/club experience of 1-2 practices per week. So, I wrote “Unicaja” rather than “European” or “International” because I know that different clubs at different levels and in different countries have different systems, and this is but one example.

    As for high schools, for most good players in California, they play varsity as a freshman or sophomore, so they really only play for one coach (especially girls). And, if not, the varsity coach usually runs the basketball program in its entirety, at least with the programs with which I am familiar. They hire the lower level coaches, determine the schedule, run the off-season program, etc. I’m sure that is not the case everywhere, but that is why I used “average” and “typical.”

  4. A few thoughts:

    - I know the EDL is your baby, something you’re very passionate about, Brian. My question for you: how do you plan to pry the power from HS and Club coaches? I understand your idea, and think it is very interesting. But if the club and HS coaches are fighting for time like you describe in this post, how will the EDL fit in? I think the structure and purpose you describe here and in your book is interesting, but in practicality, how would your system take the best players from the HS/Club power grip?

    - How many Club/HS coaches here have trouble communicating with the other side? I coach at the youth level, running a program through our school (school league, summer league, off-season workouts, tournaments, and additional winter league). I’ve had a couple girls play club ball, and I’ve tried to communicate with both the players, to no avail. One player is very loyal and respectful to me, where the other sometimes dismissive. I envy Club coaches for the talent they often have, but I also respect the coaches they are, and would like their input on a player we share. I get nothing back. Is this normal? I’ve never had a conflict “sharing” a player during the season, but if there’s no communication like this, one may come.

  5. The EDL only works if USA Basketball or the NBA organize and fund it. I figure that if the NBA invites a player to play in the EDL, he will have no problem leaving his high school team and AAU program to join an EDL team.

    When I first wrote the article, in 2001 I think, my suggestion was for the top AAU programs to work together to form the EDL and raise the standard of coaching within those organizations. However, now I have a hard time believing that so many different organizations would work together from the ground up, so I imagine it will take top-down management and the shoe companies, USA Basketball or the NBA are the only ones with the power to make that happen.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.