Player Development with Dwight Howard and Andrew Bynum

In April, Dan Patrick asked Phil Jackson who he would pick to start a team. Jackson answered Dwight Howard. I reacted.

In the comments, I made an outrageous statement. I wrote:

I’m still not convinced that he’s better than Andrew Bynum if Bynum could stay healthy.

Howard will always be a better defender, but Bynum is a better offensive player. He has better touch, a better shot and a better feel. Howard is  an athletic beast on the offensive end; Bynum has size, quickness and agility, plus he has nice moves and touch.

The difference is that Howard was drafted to a team in rebuilding mode. He became the team’s franchise player almost from Day 1 and allowed to play through mistakes. He knows when he takes the court that he will not come out of the game if he misses a shot or if his man gets a rebound because he tries to block a shot. He knows that his coach and his teammates trust him, and he has had several years in this situation to develop through game situations and game play. He has grown into a dominant force because he was allowed to make mistakes, and he had the personality to cope with mistakes and failures. He took the mistakes as learning experiences because he was allowed to play through them and make adjustments.

Bynum, on the other hand, was drafted to a team in win-now mode with a coach who favors veterans and an unrelenting superstar who does not accept mistakes. He plays on a crowded front line with other talented players fighting for playing time. If he misses a block out or misses a shot, his minutes dwindle. He does not have the same feelings of confidence because he has teammates getting on him and a coach who gives him inconsistent playing time (the injuries obviously have affected his growth and the way he is perceived as well). Rather than viewing mistakes as learning experiences and playing through them, he has pressure to perform to earn more playing time. In this environment, mistakes are unacceptable and a sign of failure, not a learning experience.

If Bynum had been traded to the Kings during his rookie season, as was rumored, and the Kings coaching staff installed him as the starting center and franchise player, I believe he would be a completely different player right than what we see during his brief, inconsistent minutes with the Lakers.

Greg Oden also faces a challenge similar to Bynum’s: when he returns to full health for a full season, will McMillan give him the minutes and allow him to learn through mistakes, like Howard’s experience in Orlando, or will his minutes depend on performance from game to game, like Bynum’s experience in Los Angeles? If Oden suffers from a similar situation to Bynum’s, he may never maximize his full potential.

Who knows if Oden or Bynum have the mental make-up to be “The Man” on a championship caliber team? But, unless they are give the opportunity to make and learn from mistakes while playing with teammates who trust them and a coach who gives them consistent minutes, we may never know.

I believe that a player has to play to develop. I strongly believe that NBA teams who do not have room in their rotation for a rookie should use the NBA Development League to give the player playing time. I believe that players drafted to be the franchise player – typically players taken in the top 5 picks depending on the year – need to play right away and need a coach willing to give the players room to develop.

The Magic organization gave Howard the confidence to play and the minutes to develop. They invested in his development. The Lakers, due to their differing situations and coaches (and injuries), have not invested in Bynum in a similar fashion.

Howard has said he wants to be the best player in the NBA. He has that mentality. I have never heard Bynum say anything to that effect. Maybe Howard has developed because of his mentality, while Bynum struggles for playing time because he lacks the same kind of mentality.

However, with young players, I do not believe the myth that players develop by watching. They need to play and they need to be in situations where the coach lets them play through mistakes and with teammates who trust the young player. Howard had that opportunity; Bynum has not. We’ll see what happens next season if Bynum stays healthy, gets consistent minutes and gains the trust of his teammates.

~ by Brian McCormick on May 29, 2009.

8 Responses to “Player Development with Dwight Howard and Andrew Bynum”

  1. Understand and partly agree with the sentiment of your article, but strongly disagree that Bynum would have developed quicker in a different environment. Bynum was developing nicely until the injury bug hit him two years in a row. You have to commend what the Lakers have done with him in such a short period of time. He was making an impact in the league at the start of his third year. If he didn’t get injured, I doubt that the Lakers would have traded for Gasol.

  2. 1. Between Dwight Howard and Andrew Bynum, at this stage of their careers, I would choose Andrew Bynum.

    2. 100% agree with Cgbasket’s opinion, re: Bynum’s injuries the last two seasons and the impact he was beginning to make with the Lakers, in that specific “development environment”.

    Then, again, some might say that I have a bias towards Baby Huey, as I would also take him over a stud like Yao Ming, as well. :-)

  3. Brian,

    Please check your Spam Box. I just tried to post a comment [with a link] in this thread and it’s failed to appear yet.

    Same thing happened to me this morning on another web site and it turned out that my comment had been accidently re-directed there instead.

    Thanks, in advance.

  4. Khandor,

    Can’t agree with you that Bynum is a better prospect than Howard. More comments to come on this issue as the series unfolds. Can’t wait to view Lakers vs. Magic. Many individual match-ups are intriguing. Bynum vs. Howard might not be matched up for long stretches given the skill level of Lewis and Turkoglu. Will be interesting to see how Bynum matches up with the force and fury of Howard’s game. This series is more interesting than Lakers vs. Cavs match-up.

  5. At this point, I do not believe that Bynum is a better prospect. However, my larger point is about opportunity and situations.

    I do believe that Bynum is more skilled than Howard offensively, and that if he was a #1 option could be a major force offensively in the NBA.

    However, Howard has the right personality to be a star, while Bynum has yet to show that. Does Bynum want to be the greatest player, as Howard has expressed? I don’t know.

    My bigger question is: How has their situations affected their personality? Does Howard have that confidence and personality because he has always been the man in Orlando and was a #1 pick? Or, did he have it beforehand and that is why he was the #1 pick?

    Does Bynum appear to lack it because he has never been more than the third weapon on his team or has he never been more than the third weapon on the team because he lacks the attitude? Would his development and progression be different if he was in a different situation, especially from a mental perspective?

  6. Cgbasket,

    Please Note: I did NOT say that I think Andrew Bynum is a better “prospect” than Dwight Howard.

    IMO, Dwight Howard is a better “prospect” than Andrew Bynum … but, what I said before was that, at this stage of their careers, I would select Andrew Bynum ahead of Dwight Howard.

    Those two observations are saying something different, although others might well see THAT difference as being little more than semantics … in my book, it is not.

    Dwight Howard bio
    Andrew Bynum bio

  7. Khandor,

    Please explain to me what is the difference between saying that “at this stage of their career, I (Khandor) would select Andrew Bynum ahead of Howard” vs. Bynum is a better prospect than Howard. Look forward to hearing Khandor speak and reasoning.

  8. Cgbasket,

    With the physical, mental & emotional attributes he brings to the table … there is no better basketball “prospect” today than Dwight Howard.

    However, somewhat along the lines of what Brian has observed, in part, when you introduce the notion of skill level & functionality on a basketball court and in conjunction with a basketball TEAM, including a high level coach … I, personally, like/prefer/etc. the combination which Andrew Bynum presents for MY TEAM, at the Center position, rather than what’s included with Dwight Howard at-present.

    * I do not agree with Brian that Howard’s advanced further to this point in his career because of the environment he has had to work in and/or the “attitude of greatness” which some might say he already possesses.

    * I agree with you that the environment Bynum has been in with the Lakers has stood him in stead, thus far, and will allow him to improve by leaps & bounds down-the-road, as well.

    * I agree with you that Bynum has had the misfortune of being injured during consecutive years early in his pro career, and once he recovers from this is on-course to become a DOMINANT Center in the NBA for years to come … depending on the continued growth & development of his Character.

    Andrew Bynum turns 22 this year.

    Dwight Howard turns 24 this year.

    Andrew Bynum has missed major parts of the last 2 seasons with serious knee injuries AND has battled his way back on both occasions.

    Dwight Howard has yet to sustain a major injury to this point in his pro career.

    For me, Dwight is the better “prospect”, as a basketball player … but, at this stage of their respective careers, I would choose Andrew Bynum as the Center for MY TEAM over Dwight Howard.

    [PS. If you'd like to know the other 4-7 players I would also choose to play on MY TEAM, in the NBA, if I had my druthers, I'd be happy to share that with you, as well. You might be surprised by some of my selections. Or, perhaps, not. :-) ]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.